Mike Tyson wird wie folgt zitiert: „Wer ist dieser Klitschko überhaupt? Ich habe keine Ahnung. Man muss den Namen googeln, wenn man etwas. Ich bin zurück!“ Mit diesen drei Worten kündigte Box-Legende Mike Tyson (53) sein Comeback an. In einem Trainings-Video, das durch soziale. Arnold Schwarzenegger und Wladimir Klitschko sollen Hück bei seinem ehrgeizigen Ziel unterstützen. None. Große Ziele: Uwe Hück will Mike.
Mike Tyson zollt Wladimir Klitschko für seine Karriere höchsten RespektDer frühere Schwergewichts-Champion Mike Tyson hat sich vor dem zurückgetretenen Wladimir Klitschko und seinem älteren Bruder Vitali verneigt. Boxen: Mike Tyson adelt Wladimir und Vitali Klitschko Mayweather vs. Wir schauen uns die Paarung Tyson vs. Klitschko mal etwas näher an. Mike Tyson, „Iron Mike“ genannt, zählt wohl zu den schlagstärksten. 'Iron Mike': Klitschko gehört zu den ganz Großen. Mike Tyson hat nach dem Rücktritt von Wladimir Klitschko dessen Karriere gewürdigt: "Auf.
Mike Tyson Vs Klitschko Random Quote VideoWladimir klitschko vs Mike Tyson Evander Holyfield has stirred up boxing fans by stating his belief that a trilogy fight with former foe Mike Tyson is likely to go ahead. Holyfield has seen victory over Tyson twice before in the. rar full Fight ibf Tyson Mask holyfaceofjesus.com Klitschko's reign as unified heavyweight champion came to a stunning end when Tyson Fury dethroned him of the WBA (super), IBF and WBO titles. 'Dr Steelhammer' fought Anthony Joshua in his comeback. Despite fighting legendary champions Tyson and Klitschko during his long career, Lewis plumped for Holyfield as his toughest-ever opponent. Lewis finished his career with a record of , with. Despite fighting Tyson and Klitschko during his long career, Lewis plumped for Holyfield as his toughest-ever opponent. Lewis finished his career with a record of , with his final-ever fights coming against Tyson and Klitschko in 20respectively. The Brit ace KOd Tyson in the eighth.
Mike Tyson Vs Klitschko. - HauptnavigationSportgames ist sich der Jährige sicher, dass er Klitschko in seiner Hochzeit geschlagen hatte: "Das wäre ein guter Kampf gewesen.
Mike Tyson fully backed fellow boxing legend Wladimir Klitschko to be a world heavyweight champion in any era of boxing. Former unified champ Klitschko, 43, became a dominant force in the heavyweight division from the mids until his stunning defeat against Tyson Fury in During an 'Ask Me Anything' on Reddit , a fan asked Tyson for his verdict on Klitschko's long reign over heavyweight boxing.
The fan pointed to criticisms about the Ukrainian dominating for so long due to the lack of world-class boxers.
Find More Posts by justnz Add justnz27 to Your Ignore List. Quote: Originally Posted by LegendOfLink Hard to say seeing how its a fantasy fight and the heavyweight division wasn't much better when Tyson was fighting.
Find More Posts by 2fast2strong Add 2fast2strong to Your Ignore List. These two would never have fought, see what good friends they are Find More Posts by Abraham Reyes.
Find More Posts by Alx. Posting Rules. We all know about Buster but we also know that leading up to that fight, Tyson wasn't focused on training and was even floored in a sparring session, not to mention he had at this time probably the most inept corner ever assembled for a championship fight.
Meanwhile Buster despite or because of the death of his mother put on the best fight of his career against a highly unfocused undertrained Tyson.
People tend to forget that Tyson had Douglas all but knocked out before being knocked out himself, Douglas was just in an incredible zone that night in a once in a lifetime type of performance against a sub-par Tyson.
Earlier Tyson victims like Frank Bruno, Pinklon Thomas, and Trevor Berbick were all about Buster's size so that I would say Buster's will and not his size were the determining factor in this fight.
Tyson in his prime was a larger, more powerful, faster, two-handed version of Joe Frazier with defense and I think Joe would go the distance with Wlad only to lose a decision.
These guys were far from stellar, yet Tyson could not handle them properly because they were too tall. He nearly knocked him out yes but apart from that Douglas was winning entire fight.
They didn't try to win, only survive. Maybe that's why Buster did better because he wasn't afraid. You contradict yourself because in another article you said that height is not such a big advantage.
In reality it is a huge factor. When Wladimir Klitschko faced Tony Thompson his awesome defence was useless because Thompson was almost as tall as Wlad.
Punching power won him the fight. I think that Mike would be more competive against Vitalij. Vitalij is slower and does not have same punching power as Wlad.
No, I stated in the other article, that height is a small factor when the opponent is bummy. Weight is a far bigger factor even if your opponent is bummy.
Thompson was almost as tall as Wlad, that's true. I did not know that Thompson was heavier but he had many chances to attack Wlad. Wlads chin was wide open.
It was a shame that Thompson was featherfist because technicaly he was very solid. Even Lewis said that. Thompson is not a featherfist.
That Thompson lost basically every round while outweighing Wlad just shows you the class that Wlad is. And, look, you can always find some guy who was taller and lost or who was taller and won.
And you can always find some guy who was heavier and lost or was lighter and won. Thompson was no great KO artist.
Please stop overrating Wlads oponnents. His two best oponents were Corrie Sanders and David Haye. My personal opinion is that prime Riddick Bowe would be great challenge for Wlad.
Obviously Riddick would be challenge for Wladimir. Even thought Bowe dodged Lewis, had they fought, Lewis would not have "walked over" Bowe, as would be the case Wlad vs Bowe.
To simply dismiss great modern boxing champ against Wlad with a simple statement "he would throw his belt in the trash" but devote 10 articles to how Wladimir would kill a champ of 40 years ago does not cut it.
Once again you are miscomparing stats to prove your point. Tyson had a solid punch that knocked out well over 20 opponents all taller than him.
After he went to prison where he couldn't train he was on a decline, especially when don king that ex murderer started to influence him and distract him.
Tyson would have destroyed klitcho because klitcho faces the same problem, never having fought a fighter of decent skill except Lewis and he got it handed to him.
Tyson and Tommy Morrison are my 2 favourite boxers and they both were champions and both competitive in the modern sense.
But they would NOT have destroyed the Klitschko's dude. Tommy was not skilled enough to get inside Wlad and land his big bombs.
He still had enough skill to last with Wlad and had a strong punchers chance one of the hardest punchers of all time but probably would have ended the same as with Lennox.
Tommy also had a suspect chin. Tyson very similar, slightly less power but with more skill may have been able to get into Tyson and work on the inside where he was adept but once again it probably would have ended similar to how it did with Lennox.
We have to admit that. Imo relatively clearly. I agree totally with you. He was small and still pretty damn good boxer. But this could be used in Joe Frazier case too.
I do not know why you hate Joe Frazier so much that you actually call him one eyed dwarf when in reality he was taller than Mike.
I think that Mike Joe and Marciano are three small heavyweights who were sometimes much better than their taller oponents. They all deserve credit.
Not only Mike. Marciano deserves credit as boxer, not as heavyweight. Rocky Marciano wasn't. Neither was he a heavyweight, nor was he fighting heavy boxers.
Yes Joe mythology right? It seems that Joe and Muhammad are your least favorite boxers. That is your opinion but it is not necessary to critisize them for not fullfiling your image of great boxers.
They were great boxers my opinion. I can see how Joe and Mike can be compared with their comparable sizes and swarming style, that comparison is most close and obvious.
But that's where it ends imo. I can't see h2h Joe performing much better than his son. Frazier was nothing compared to Tyson.
Tyson even had better opponents at respective stages of their careers in relative and absolute terms. Also Tyson was a jacked athlete.
Frazier was not. Obviously Frazier was good boxer to make it to the top. But imo he was only champion for a time because he was lucky.
Ali was stripped. Frazier fought an elimination. Frazier got bashed by a real champion and lost it. The fact that Frazier beat Ali once and was problems for him was as the author tells it.
A proof that Ali was limited, not the greatness of Frazier. More specifically it was representative of the "styles make fights" hypothesis.
Had he the power of Tyson, Frazier would have supplanted Ali conclusively. Frazier would have failed against Holmes, another outside fighter and been stopped by all later ranged fighters quite easily because they all had big punches to catch him on the way in.
This is just my opinion Honza but I wanted to explain my view more fully since I have trash talked Frazier without really explaining it elsewhere.
Could Wlad or Vitali have beaten Tyson on that night? Possibly on points or by late round stoppage but that's not a given. You must be joking.
Tyson was a mile ahead on points and the fight is stopped when Ruddock's arms and legs declare independence from the rest of him.
The K brothers have one huge advantage of Tyson though. They are professional and Tyson wasn't after , not consistently and you can't keep doing that in boxing and get away with it.
That was too too soon. He wasn't down. He hadn't been counted. That was too soon a knockdown", "a total fiasco", "that was surely bad judgment", "another questionable judgment" and many other things.
Who cares what commentators think or says. Please, stop act like a typical fanboy. One of the most stupid arguments. Some facts: Tyson knocked out Ribalta.
This is a big difference. Tyson hadn't problem the height. I accept the height and weight mania reigns in this i think overmanaged,doping influenced boxing but Tyson beat lots of 6'4" or taller fighter easily.
Respect tha fact at least! And don't forget Holyfield,lewis,klitschko were very skinny beanpoles earlier but their WELL-trained years.
I think their results based on doping and this is a shame. For example the prime Lewis in ran a ridicolous incredible lame estimated at half mile in The Superstars.
An average Joe can do this far better. And Chris Byrd a weak,talentless,fat,glass-chinned,boring guy beat vitali. Boxing is an overrated suckfest!
But, please respect the facts and don't create false,pathetic interpretations for klitschko sisters' reputation! Talent arguments will go on in years and are fruitless.
I guarantee you that even nowadays boxing fans ask questions like "Had Frazier more talent than Jim Jeffries?
I love Mike but have to agree with this analysis. He struggled with skills guys at 6'4 and over. Both K Bros are extremely skilled and athletic and huge.
Simply too much of an advantage. Whatever man, when it all comes to it, Klitschko's suck, they are the best because it is a weak era, if they were boxing in times of legends no1 would have ever heared of those 2 bozo's.
Their fighting style is always soooo boring to watch and they got absolutely no personality at all. What rubbish. In what era would you find the Klitschko's on the top tier?
If you think they are boring that is your call don't even try to say they would be anonymous in any earlier era you know that isn't true!
Tyson is the sharpest double edged sword of boxing. One thing is abundantly clear from the get go. Tactical boxing matches which also feature KO's are entertainment : but they do not excite nearly as much as a Tyson marathon does.
He was the most explosive HW of all time, my personal favourite to watch! Sure he has perfected his minimalist style to keep a swarming fighter like Tyson at bay, Tyson who has lost to far inferior competition to Wladimir, he is very skilled but there are 2 versions of Mike.
I know Mike fought lots of bums and cruisers early on when he was touted as the hottest thing since sliced bread and when the competition got better and bigger Mike became more challenged and that is true.
But it also coincided with the observable fact that after Mike fired Rooney you can clearly see a degeneration of his style.
Lack of head movement, peek-a-boo guard and combination punching. He lost himself. He was 7" shorter and 30lbs lighter and may never have been able to defeat prime Wladimir but in my opinion it took far more skill to stay in close and perform that style, that awesome defense and killer attack than it currently takes for Wlad to keep a fighter at bay and pick his shots while skipping out of range into relative safety when things get too hot.
If Tyson had kept it together and continued to develop that beautiful style he had there is no telling how much further it may have taken him.
He may never have beaten Lennox or might not have been able to defeat Wlad or Vitali, any claims to that are speculative, but I would certainly give him more than a punchers chance if things had been a little different for Mike.
What I'm trying to say is that it isn't hard to imagine Mike beating Lennox and moving on to being the greatest Heavyweight of the 90s as well as the 80s.
It didn't happen and may not have regardless of fate but I believe he had the tools to make it. He had and I think that if the match had hapenned 10 years before Mike would had bigger chance beating Lewis.
Imagine Riddick vs. Bowe in That would be good fight. Larry Holmes said that he would rather fight Lewis instead of Riddick.
What an epic battle lol. Holyfield is a stellar HW of course. And Bowe, despite not fighting a lot of the top contenders of the era which is a shame because he sure could have rocked, was still so awesome.
Whether he could have beaten Lewis we can't say but he sure as hell would have been the toughest competition he had faced.
Bowe had enough attributes, the size and skill to be one of the greatest champs as well. I understand Wladimir never wanted to fight his brother fair enough but Wladimir never fought anybody as massive AND skilled as Riddick Bowe.
His failure against the bigger boys would be a result of his physical limitations. His modern resistance training can compensate and increase for many things, except obviously height and reach and most importantly it does not significantly increase punch power!
It will in the sense that the increased muscle represents an increased weight. But the muscle strength, the usual bulk muscles anyway, increase it only slightly and are best developed through the heavy bag.
I think Holyfield's losses to his smaller opponents at HW may be a result of how weights may have stiffened him up somewhat. A double edged sword, trying to gain muscle weight to fight the big boys but in the process negatively affecting your ability to match the smaller ones.
I agree. Good example was his fight with Byrd. I believe that being that young fast Evander than Byrd would not have much of a chance against him.
Also I like your favorites from 90s. Those guys would be dangerous in any era I believe. Yeah it's a mirror image list of mine as well.
George had the lasting attributes to fight on. Tommy may have faced some issues but that punch lol he was one of my favs im a fan :.
You are going to hurt these guys or they're gonna die, get brain damage or broken bones," he added. A fan on social media asked Tyson if he thought Klitschko would have been a "formidable heavyweight champion even in the 'Golden Age?
He ended his professional career with 64 wins in 69 fights, 53 wins by knockout, and holds three major records of the modern heavyweight era; the most wins in heavyweight title bouts 25 , most wins in unified championship bouts 15 and most consecutive defenses of the unified title Chosen for You Chosen for You.